Talks about issues related to the farms belonging to the heirs of Haj ‘Abd al-Rahim Vakil al-Dawlah, and mentions a settlement which indicates that these properties formerly owned by the late Umm al-Khaqan are now owned by Sardar Mu‘tazad; the properties rented by the late Mu‘in al-Ra‘aya and later Haji Mu‘addil, the attorney of ‘Inayat Allah Khan, had taken the properties from the heirs of the late Mu‘in al-Ra‘aya. The author complains to the addressee for not addressing these issues and asks him for an investigation and to give these properties back to the heir of the late Vakil al-Dawlah.
Discusses financial matters including a quarrel about ʻIzzat al-Dawlah's inheritance and a receipt related to the late Umm al-Khaqan
The writer, after mentioning his previous letter and not getting a reply from the addressee regarding the inheritance of the late ‘Izzat al-Dawlah, which was confiscated by the late Umm al-Khaqan for no reason despite the legitimate rights of the deceased's heirs, including the author himself, asks for a prompt consideration.
Includes a discussion about the sale of Najm al-Saltanah and Umm al-Khaqan properties and the interest of Qavam al-Dawlah and Ahmad Qavam in these properties
Copyright © 2012-14 President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved.
